Skip to content
View The Trailer
Animal Cognition: Who is Really "Top Dog"? E-mail
Written by Jeanne Roberts   
Wednesday, 02 April 2008

Rene Descartes, 17th century French philosopher and coiner of the phrase, "I think, therefore I am (cogito ergo sum)", hedged his bets when it came to animal cognition.

Black Crow
Photo:monkeyc.net, Creative Commons, Flickr

Though Descartes insisted that any thinking being must have a soul, and hinted that animals did in fact think, he refused to take a public position on the issue because the Catholic Church - the ruling entity at the time - taught otherwise.


The Catholic church has since changed its position. In a public audience on January 19, 1990, Pope John Paul II said, "also the animals possess a soul and men must love and feel solidarity with smaller brethren".

Unfortunately for Descartes, it's too late to go public. Not so for the rest of us, and proof of animal cognition is everywhere.

Why, then, do we persist in viewing animals as lesser beings, subject to our will? Why are we not able to perceive that animals may be as important to the cosmic scheme of things as we are? Is a mouse less necessary to the universe than a man, and if so, why? Because of its size, its inability to vocalize, its failure to use tools or technology, or is it simply because we humans deem it lacking in the same kind of intelligence we imagine we possess? What is intelligence, anyway? For that matter, what is a soul?

In Loring Park, Minneapolis, the crows have funerals. I have seen them. They surround their fallen brethren in silence, occasionally touching the stilled, black feathers with a beak, as though to breathe life into what was once animate. Sometimes they caw softly, a melancholy sound that perfectly fits the palpably funereal atmosphere. These funerals can last up to half a hour, and then the living silently take wing, filling the sky with inky shadows. If this is not sorrow, and the morbid curiosity that accompanies death, I don't know what is.

Elsewhere, Friederike Range from the University of Vienna demonstrates that dogs are able to learn the complex classifications for a series of color photographs and place them in categories in exactly the same way a human would. In other words, the dogs don't merely perform the task by rote, but actually interpret and process information to arrive at the sorting methodology. If that isn't intelligence, I don't know what is.

In Florida and California, scrub jays have been observed hiding food from their fellow birds, all of whom are notorious thieves. In the wild, they appear to know the "expiration date" on these stashes, and eat the perishable ones first. In captivity, they hide food supplies in areas of the compound where no breakfast is provided. My butcher still hasn't mastered the former skill, nor my son the latter.

Rio, a 7-year old sea lion who lives at the Sea-Lion Cognitive Laboratory in Santa Cruz, California, can work out that if A equals B, and B equals C, then C equals A. This understanding of mathematical transitivity is remarkable. I consider myself relatively intelligent, but I gave up on these kinds of equations in high school. Rio can also pair symbols, letters and pictures with equivalent values, proving that he understands the concept of symmetry. A fair portion of adults taking the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) do not do as well as Rio.

Hob, a male falcon owned by Paul Gillott, once solicited his owner's help in getting prey out of a rabbit hole. This behavior is singularly unheard of, and few humans with the gift of speech are as articulate in asking for help. Shigeru Watanabe of Japan's Keio University has demonstrated that pigeons can recognize artists, and artistic styles (pointillism, for example) even in paintings they haven't seen before - and even when the paintings are hung upside down. Ninety five percent of humans don't know the difference between Chiaroscuro and Cubism. Sheep recognize faces, and avoid an overly rough shearer based solely on his features. Bees also apparently recognize faces. Most adults can't remember a face unless they see it regularly over a two or three day period. Parrots, and their smaller cousins the parakeets, can converse intelligently. Parakeets are difficult to understand because their speech is so rapid, but Alex, a grey parrot, can not only talk in a relatively human fashion, he has proven cognitive abilities. That is, he recognizes the concept of zero. Alex died recently.

Unfortunately, psychologists refuse to attribute intelligence to an animal if its behavior can be explained away in simpler terms, and people - ever "aping" those they perceive to be superior - have largely adopted this attitude. When pet owners describe their pet's intelligent behaviors, naysayers call it anthropomorphism (the attribution of uniquely human characteristics to nonhuman beings). Just the definition rankles; animals may not be human, but they are clearly sentient and capable of a wide range of emotions. Before you frown in disbelief, consider the fact that not very long ago scientists believed animals couldn't feel pain and performed surgical procedures without anesthetic. We now know that even plants feel pain, and can communicate at great distances with one another. and with members of the insect world.

Mirror neurons (see Ramachandran) make evolution and language possible. Human vocal cords make language feasible, but verbalization is not the only form of communication. Animals possess telepathic powers, which we humans apparently surrendered with the advent of language, but who is to say which is the more effective form of communication, or which demonstrates more intelligence?

These discoveries of animal cognition (and twenty first century science as a whole) are leading us back into a world we once inhabited, where all creatures lived in harmony and respect for one another and the sublime mystery of life. If the planet is to survive, with all its species intact, we must make this move willingly, recognizing that we are not the only relevant life-form on earth, and perhaps not even its most intelligent member, but part of a biosphere where all creatures interact to create a balanced ecosystem.

Before all the birds and bees and whales and bats are gone, it's time to realize that we cannot live without them, but they can live without us. So who is really "top dog" here?

I don't own stock in any facility conducting animal research.

Site Disclaimer


Jeanne Roberts  Opinions 

Comments (3)add
...
written by Adam Waitt , April 03, 2008
In my opinion, the overarching difference between Humans and the rest of the animal kingdom is the ability for the Homo sapien species to all but eliminate natural selection. Most of our other differences can be derived from this distinction. This is not meant to imply that we no longer evolve; it is a possible explanation for humans being the most diverse species on earth. However, remember that we evolved from apes. In the traditional sense of the word intelligence, apes are rather stupid. Apes will not hesitate to kill another organism if is advantageous for them to do so. However apes lack the ability to harm enough of all other species to have a lasting effect on the ecosystem.

I guess my point is that Humans are learning. In the cosmic scheme of things, we have acquired self recognition a relatively short time ago. We have acquired the ability to artificially alter the ecosystem an even shorter of a time ago. We have acquired the ability to recognize that our actions have a lasting effect on our environment only in the last 100 years. We have yet to figure out which path is the best course of action to rectify the situation.

So yes... everyone should be a champion for the environment. Just don't be surprised if some individuals just can't understand where you are coming from, and please don't try to require people to conform via government regulation. Persuasion rather then force is a much more efficient way to shift a population's mindset. (This well written article is a great example of that point)
...
written by Jeanne Roberts , April 03, 2008
Humans may not be the only self-aware species; we simply don't have the tools to determine whether animals are self-aware or not. I suspect some are. Otherwise, I agree with you entirely, and would further observe that government regulation more often than not simply muddies the waters. The current "green" movement clearly did not devolve from government regulations, but from the instincts of people who know we have reached a juncture in time where failing to act may result in ecological collapse. Thank you for your comments, and your support.
...
written by Adam Waitt , April 03, 2008
I suspect other species are self aware as well. My cat seems to have a clear and definite idea about what he wants at any given time. What my cat lacks is the ability to use that knowledge to do much more then patrol his domain (my apartment).

Humans have honed their self awareness to the point where we can pretty accurately decipher our place in the universe relative to our surroundings. A very powerful tool which to the majority of the population is taken for granted.
Write comment

busy
Tag it:
YahooBuzz
Stumble
Facebook
Digg
Delicious
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Digg
Hugg
Reddit
Spurl

Jeanne Roberts
About the author:
The author was born in Colorado and spent much of her early life traveling around the Southwest with her father, Luverne Cartier, an engineer and building contractor who advocated the use of sustainable design before it was popular.
Read More >>
Last Updated ( Monday, 07 April 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >
View The Trailer

Top

Members