Skip to content
View The Trailer
Gore on Reason E-mail
Written by Richard Reiss   
Tuesday, 12 June 2007

Previous Photo:World Resources Institute Staff, Creative Commons, Flickr

A day after finishing Al Gore's new book, "The Assault on Reason," an image flashed before me: Gore is like a bookend to William Jennings Bryan, another interesting American who never got to be president. I think Bryan may be best known to people with a Northeastern public school education, like my own, as the losing side in "Inherit the Wind." I think my education, perhaps, missed the point about Bryan completely. And the schism post-Bryan created the space for the modern Republican party, and everything Gore dislikes.

The Gore book is good, and I recommend it. Even better is to read the Wikipedia entry on Bryan as a chaser to "The Assault on Reason," and then take a deep breath. A pure and complete vision of America may unfold before you. A view which prompts the question: do the emotional benefits of the Enlightenment flow to everyone equally?

Gore is distressed by the irrational state of discourse in the US today; it's safe to say Bryan would be the one in greater shock. In a twist worthy of Orwell's "Animal Farm," Bryan's old nemeses -- the corporations and moneymen -- ultimately joined interests with evangelical churches in an economic and cultural power lock that has defined American politics for thirty years, even as income disparities grow wider and the lot of the working class grows harsher.

I found "The Assault on Reason" inspiring and frustrating, but then, it is about an inspiring and frustrating subject. Our country includes, on its resume, the moon landing, the Internet, the human genome project, and a newly opened, slickly designed museum of creationism. America so dominates higher education that it is now home to eighteen of the top twenty universities in the world. Our largest embassy, with a staff of 1000, stands in an Arab country we've invaded, knew nothing about, botched the occupation of, and where our military now struggles desperately to stop a civil war. Among that enormous, embattled embassy staff, only six of them are fluent in Arabic (the other 994 must pass the days talking to each other).

America has more than 1000 billionaires, dwarfing the country next in rank, Germany (55), followed by Russia (53).

According to Harper's, the percentage of Republicans in Congress who believe humans are causing climate change has dropped from 23% in April, 2006, to 16% in January, 2007 (perhaps because the last election removed many moderate Republicans, or Republicans looking for photo ops with Bono).

Despite China's recent boom in manufacturing, America is still the most vital arena for capitalism, and the world's greatest magnet for talent. And yet the seemingly wild imperial blunders/missions of liberation of post-WWII America have been damaging to both American citizens and to the image of the country abroad, as well as devastating to many hundreds of thousands of innocents (and a few less innocent) caught in the path of the world's remaining superpower. How does this American democracy work? How does democracy work? How does reasoning work?

As with his earlier book "An Inconvenient Truth," Gore has chosen a terrific subject. And of the two books, the subject of "The Assault on Reason" is paramount. How democracies reach decisions is the urgent, overarching question of which climate change policy, and our future in Iraq, are just parts. As American citizens, we are stuck with each other: two-fisted CEO's, middle managers, burger flippers, the employed and unemployed, the churched and the unchurched. If our nation makes good or bad decisions as a democratic society, we are responsible as a group.

I think, to be a useful American, and not just a freeloader on the system, perhaps one needs to begin to build one's own mental picture of the country, a picture that somehow accounts for the contradictions pointed out above. To do that you'd have to be curious about yourself and the origins of your own views, and then be curious about others as well, especially those from parts of the country with differing opinions or outlooks.

Curiosity is the opposite of ideology (an exercise I occasionally do upon waking up is to try to figure out why I'm not a creationist, since half or more than half of my fellow citizens are -- and they usually get to pick the president).

Gore's book focuses more on the mechanics of our system of government and less on sociology. He concentrates on developments that he feels distort the voice of the people (chiefly money and television). He also recounts the history of the present administration and various damages to democracy that he sees as resulting from Bush policies. He avoids talking about the emotional chemistry of the US -- and I'm not sure you can fully investigate American democracy and not address the cultural and regional differences; for instance, the role of status and personal narrative in how people view their own lives and whom to vote for -- but for an introduction to modern problems in democratic theory, "The Assault on Reason" is a good place to start (just as "An Inconvenient Truth" provides an overview, albeit in one voice, of the climate issue).

The main thing is to begin thinking about America. "The Assault on Reason" can be your starter kit.


Full disclosure: Two years ago I wrote a proposal for a multimedia project on American democracy which wrestles with some of the problems Gore identifies.

For that project, I wrote an essay on democracy and television, which includes samples of commercials used for political and consumer marketing. This essay was in response to a talk by the sociologist Francesca Polletta on the nature of storytelling within deliberative groups. Polletta has been studying the public, democratic deliberation groups set up to help determine the design and rebuilding of the World Trade Center site.

Footnote: Books that might fit into this American symphony with Bryan and Gore about work and identity, include Louis Uchitelle's "The Disposable American" and Jack Welch's "Winning." For a book founded on the premise that people like to be irrational if and when irrational behavior raises their status, see Eric Hoffer's indispensable "The True Believer."


Book Reviews  Culture  Politics 

Comments (4)add
...
written by Arnaud , July 01, 2007
BY JAMES M. TAYLOR

In his new book, The Assault on Reason, Al Gore pleads, "We must stop tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end to the cynical use of pseudo-studies known to be false for the purpose of intentionally clouding the public's ability to discern the truth." Gore repeatedly asks that science and reason displace cynical political posturing as the central focus of public discourse.

If Gore really means what he writes, he has an opportunity to make a difference by leading by example on the issue of global warming.

A cooperative and productive discussion of global warming must be open and honest regarding the science. Global warming threats ought to be studied and mitigated, and they should not be deliberately exaggerated as a means of building support for a desired political position.
Many of the assertions Gore makes in his movie, ''An Inconvenient Truth,'' have been refuted by science, both before and after he made them. Gore can show sincerity in his plea for scientific honesty by publicly acknowledging where science has rebutted his claims.

For example, Gore claims that Himalayan glaciers are shrinking and global warming is to blame. Yet the September 2006 issue of the American Meteorological Society's Journal of Climate reported, "Glaciers are growing in the Himalayan Mountains, confounding global warming alarmists who recently claimed the glaciers were shrinking and that global warming was to blame."

Gore claims the snowcap atop Africa's Mt. Kilimanjaro is shrinking and that global warming is to blame. Yet according to the November 23, 2003, issue of Nature magazine, "Although it's tempting to blame the ice loss on global warming, researchers think that deforestation of the mountain's foothills is the more likely culprit. Without the forests' humidity, previously moisture-laden winds blew dry. No longer replenished with water, the ice is evaporating in the strong equatorial sunshine."

Gore claims global warming is causing more tornadoes. Yet the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change stated in February that there has been no scientific link established between global warming and tornadoes.

Gore claims global warming is causing more frequent and severe hurricanes. However, hurricane expert Chris Landsea published a study on May 1 documenting that hurricane activity is no higher now than in decades past. Hurricane expert William Gray reported just a few days earlier, on April 27, that the number of major hurricanes making landfall on the U.S. Atlantic coast has declined in the past 40 years. Hurricane scientists reported in the April 18 Geophysical Research Letters that global warming enhances wind shear, which will prevent a significant increase in future hurricane activity.

Gore claims global warming is causing an expansion of African deserts. However, the Sept. 16, 2002, issue of New Scientist reports, "Africa's deserts are in 'spectacular' retreat . . . making farming viable again in what were some of the most arid parts of Africa."

Gore argues Greenland is in rapid meltdown, and that this threatens to raise sea levels by 20 feet. But according to a 2005 study in the Journal of Glaciology, "the Greenland ice sheet is thinning at the margins and growing inland, with a small overall mass gain." In late 2006, researchers at the Danish Meteorological Institute reported that the past two decades were the coldest for Greenland since the 1910s.

Gore claims the Antarctic ice sheet is melting because of global warming. Yet the Jan. 14, 2002, issue of Nature magazine reported Antarctica as a whole has been dramatically cooling for decades. More recently, scientists reported in the September 2006 issue of the British journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series A: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, that satellite measurements of the Antarctic ice sheet showed significant growth between 1992 and 2003. And the U.N. Climate Change panel reported in February 2007 that Antarctica is unlikely to lose any ice mass during the remainder of the century.

Each of these cases provides an opportunity for Gore to lead by example in his call for an end to the distortion of science. Will he rise to the occasion? Only time will tell.

James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at the Heartland Institute.

...
written by Arnaud , July 01, 2007
"Only an insignificant fraction of scientists deny the global warming crisis. The time for debate is over. The science is settled."

S o said Al Gore ... in 1992. Amazingly, he made his claims despite much evidence of their falsity. A Gallup poll at the time reported that 53% of scientists actively involved in global climate research did not believe global warming had occurred; 30% weren't sure; and only 17% believed global warming had begun. Even a Greenpeace poll showed 47% of climatologists didn't think a runaway greenhouse effect was imminent; only 36% thought it possible and a mere 13% thought it probable.

Today, Al Gore is making the same claims of a scientific consensus, as do the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and hundreds of government agencies and environmental groups around the world. But the claims of a scientific consensus remain unsubstantiated. They have only become louder and more frequent.
...
written by Arnaud , July 01, 2007
The reason why so many "deniers" are in the US might be because 18 of the to 20 universities in the world are US based.
...
written by RM Reiss , July 05, 2007
If the last IPCC report bears out, historians will probably view Gore's record on global warming as more compromised by the eight years he spent in the Clinton administration, a period with no successful initiative on cars or coal, than on his accuracy in speeches in 1992 (or now, for that matter).

A good blog of climate scientists:

http://www.realclimate.org/



Write comment

busy
Tag it:
YahooBuzz
Stumble
Facebook
Digg
Delicious
Technorati
YahooMyWeb
Digg
Hugg
Reddit
Spurl

Richard Reiss
About the author:
Last Updated ( Thursday, 14 June 2007 )
 
< Prev   Next >
View The Trailer

Top

Members